The Clean Money Revolution

I met Joel Solomon five years ago. Someone pointed me to him as knowledgeable and experienced. I knew of his work Renewal Funds, and a few years ago visited his Hollyhock on Cortes Island in British Columbia, Canada to attend his Social Venture Institute.

(Disclosure: sometime in all that he agreed to invest a tiny amount into Fledge, one of my contributions to the field of social good.)

I’ve talked to Joel a few times. Perhaps two hours in total over the last five years. I’ve seen him speak at various events. I thought I knew who he was and what he did. Then I read The Clean Money Revolution and discovered a whole lot more.

As I’ve written about many times before, I love it when unseen assumptions are brought to the surface. This book is a mix of biopic and primer, between the two unwrapping the history of social/impact/clean capital.

Six years ago when I left tech to join what I call the “social good” sector, it felt like I was jumping midway into a story that was being told. There was beginning decades earlier, but those early days were not being talked about much, if at all. Over the past year through various sources, I’ve uncovered a lot more of that story, and uncovered the people who have made social good happen.

This book fills in a lot of those gaps as Joel Solomon was there at the beginning. If you like origin stories, you’ll have your fill in The Clean Money Revolution. There was an organization before Social Venture Network, which itself spawned a dozen organizations which live on today.

That is all interesting to someone like me, who wants to understand why things work they way they do, unsatisfied with the explanation that “this is how its always been done.” That is the main theme of the book, to uncover those assumptions in the economy and like Real Impact from Morgan Simon, teach the readers the importance of impact investing.

It is also interesting to compare and contrast Joel’s biopic with Morgan’s, as they both have moved the ecosystem forward more than most. Joel started back when Morgan was a toddler, but both have been at this work far longer than me.

Six years in, I still feel like a newbie, but the more events I go to, the more people are looking to me as one of the elders. I can’t imagine what that must be like for Joel, who has been doing his work for over thirty years. I am looking forward to finding out in the 2040’s.

There are a lot of great posts buried in this blog’s archives that are still quite apt. Today is another reprise, this time revisiting the (often invisible) tradeoff between efficiency and resilience. Last time I explained that tradeoff with the case study of electricity blackouts in Texas and how that related to Google’s monopoly on search and Amazon’s dominance of eCommerce...

GDP is not the best of measures but it is what we use to meaure economies. Globally, (in 2023) that totals more than $100 trillion. My post-pandemic work is primarily focused on the bottom left slice of this big pie, in Africa. That continent’s GDP is more than $3 trillion, and even 1 trillion dollars is a lot of dollars, but in comparison to the rest of the world, is tiny. Smaller still as...

Who invented double entry accounting? The ubiquitous system of general ledgers, income statements, balance sheets, and cashflow statements found throughout businesses and quite a lot of households? This is yet-another of those concept so taken for granted that they seem to have been around “forever”, but thanks to Double Entry: How the Merchants of Venice Created Modern Finance by...

Many of the everyday details in The Work of the Stock Market told in between the history facts are often just as interesting as the history itself. Case in point, if you read the history of time zones, it seemed like the standardization was complete in the U.S. and Europe by the end of the 1800s. Yet in 1922… The difference in time between London and New York is four minutes and one second...

The standard structure for private equity funds (and venture capital funds) is “2&20”, as in a 2% management fee (±1%) and 20% (±10%) of the profits, a.k.a. “carried interest“. Why 20% of the profits? Henry Kravis of KKR explains below, starting at 6:00. TL;DR: Necessity, as he and his partners had no capital to put at risk. Share this:Click to share on Twitter (Opens...